Paul
Jan 24 2008, 01:40 AM
In November, Michael Richards (best known as Kramer on Seinfeld) launched into a racist tirade during a stand up act at a comedy club, insulting patrons and mouthing off at 2 black hecklers.
After an attempt by 4 of the patrons and a handful of Black activists, including a former supreme court judge and 2 lawyers to get Richards to attend a "mock" trial,
Richards defended himself by question racism and had the following to say.
Someone finally said it.
How many are actually paying attention to this?
There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, etc.
And then there are just Americans.
You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction.
You Call me 'White boy,' 'Cracker,' 'Honkey,' 'Whitey,' 'Caveman' ... and that's OK.
But when I call you, N!gger, Kike, Towel head, Sand-n!gger, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink ...
You call me a racist.
You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you, so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?
You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day. You have Black History Month.
You have Cesar Chavez Day. You have Yom Hashoah. You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi.
You have the NAACP. You have BET. If we had WET (White Entertainment Television) we'd be racists.
If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists.
If we had White History Month , we'd be racists.
If we had any organi za tion for only whites to 'advance' OUR lives we'd be racists.
We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce.
Wonder who pays for that?
A white woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant, but any color can be in the Miss America pageant.
If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships you know we'd be racists.
There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US . Yet if there were 'White colleges' THAT would be a racist college.
In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists.
You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.
You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug-dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.
I am proud.
But you call me a racist.
Why is it that only whites can be racists?
maxxdistri
Jan 24 2008, 02:56 AM
A very unfortunate reality ...
They call it reversed racism !!
Nice post Paul, a very nice one ...
Nitro Guy
Jan 24 2008, 03:24 AM
Gee..... em i neva really though about this outside a south african context....
but yeah... i'm not white but i'll admit this is so true.....
an illustration of this being the following...
I just e mailed this to my colleague (a white dude)
he made a comment... now if he e mailed this to any black ppl he'd be racist...
if i did it it would nobody would think anything of it....
i guess ppl are just caught up in the fact that previously white ppl could do wat they want and now things are kinda reversed (racism and otherwise).
CyberStorm
Jan 24 2008, 01:08 PM
The general perception that people have is that only white people are capable of being racist. This is simply not the case! Men of all all colours and nationalities are capable of being racists!
Using this logic, I believe that there is only 'racism'. Reverse racism is for lack of a better term, utter bullshit!
Historically black people have been oppressed in both South Africa and the US by white people! As a means to survive, these oppressed societies banded together and created these racially homogeneous institutions.
Its merely historical!
QUOTE
You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us.
This statement seems to portray that only white people are the victims of crime and that the perpetrators are always non-white! A poor statement and stark generalization to say the least!
maxxdistri
Jan 24 2008, 01:13 PM
QUOTE(CyberStorm @ Jan 24 2008, 01:08 PM)

Its merely historical!
So maybe its time for all parties to get over it ..
CyberStorm
Jan 24 2008, 01:19 PM
QUOTE
So maybe its time for all parties to get over it ..
Quite possibly!
What annoys me is people using the mentally of being 'previously disadvantaged' as an excuse for their shortcomings now!
maxxdistri
Jan 24 2008, 01:42 PM
QUOTE(CyberStorm @ Jan 24 2008, 01:19 PM)

What annoys me is people using the mentally of being 'previously disadvantaged' as an excuse for their shortcomings now!
Very strong argument ...
The worst part is that most of the people using this excuse, never were disadvantaged !!!
I've said it before and i will keep on repeating myself ... you don't see the Europeans blaiming the Germans for everything cos in 40-45 they started a war ...
CyberStorm
Jan 24 2008, 10:35 PM
QUOTE
The worst part is that most of the people using this excuse, never were disadvantaged !!!
In the case case of black South Africans, this argument is somewhat valid, but is fast wearing thin! The deck is favourably stacked in their favour now!!
Heir_of_Isildur
Jan 26 2008, 07:34 AM
Go Michael Richards

'Other' races have always fought to be integrated into 'society' and accepted 'JUST THE SAME'... then they come out and make themselves 'unique' by having all these things like "Miss Black America", etc. Which is fine, but there is NO way that anything can be dedicated to whites only
Surge
Jan 27 2008, 12:21 AM
Some pretty good stuff there by Richards, and extremely valid points as well.
QUOTE
Men of all all colours and nationalities are capable of being racists!
True that. As Richards points out though, how often is a non-white labelled as a racist?
CyberStorm
Jan 27 2008, 08:13 AM
QUOTE
Go Michael Richards
Some very valid points by Richards, but his mouthing off to black people in the crowd was uncalled for and unnecessary!
There was no reason to call them nig**rs! I don't know what they said to him, but he did not have to respond the way he did! Totally not called for!
millennia
Jan 27 2008, 10:39 PM
You've completely missed the point of what he was trying to get across CyberStorm
maxxdistri
Jan 30 2008, 07:26 AM
Woepediedoe ... power for 30 minutes !!!!
Anyway
Please read this article
LinkageNow, this is very obvious a case of blatant racism ... yet, the word racist is not being used ... since there are no white people involved ...
Please do explain this to me ! Cos im curious
Psycrow
Jan 30 2008, 12:14 PM
Screw all of the race crap. Cut out the religion bull shit. Quit it with the gender discrimination as well. It's about time that we stop recognizing what color, gender, race, or religion a person is and go after them for what really pisses everyone off.... Stupidity.
Stupid comes in any color so we can't be racist.
Stupid can be found in all religions by either gender.
Stupid people make me angry.
Anyone else?
CyberStorm
Jan 31 2008, 03:21 AM
QUOTE
You've completely missed the point of what he was trying to get across CyberStorm
No I haven't!
I get his point completely..See my above posts for that!
Using the N word just not called for!
He could have made his point without resorting to such a poor choice of words!
millennia
Jan 31 2008, 03:34 AM
For the same reason that you say any of these...
QUOTE
You Call me 'White boy,' 'Cracker,' 'Honkey,' 'Whitey,' 'Caveman' ... and that's OK.