Guys, we're getting a little off-topic here. The questions posed were
QUOTE(Driver)
Do you agree or disagree? Where should the anti-crime drive start? Should it not start at home first?
In my previous post, I didn't exactly spell it out, so let me do so here. I disagree with the anti-crime drive starting "at home". It should start where it'll do the most immediate good, which as I said in my previous post, would be curbing the corruption in the top levels of our government and police force.
As citizens, we all want to see an immediate deceleration in the crime rate which will be directly the cause of a concerted action by the police force and our co-operation. Yes, the police can't be everywhere, but we as citizens can. Our co-operation is valuable and keeping our guard up is what saves lives.
I still remember an advert on television a while back where a couple are lying in bed and the wife remarks to the husband that she can hear sounds. Soon, he hears them too, but when he investigates, he sees that whatever is happening is happening next door, so he gets back into bed and goes back to sleep.
This is, albeit exaggerated, predominantly the case all over our country. People don't want to get involved in something that will put their own lives in danger especially if it doesn't directly affect them. I'm not saying we should all join neighbourhood watch committees or even worse, become vigilantes, but when communities do come together and respect the law and co-operate with the local police force, the criminals won't have anywhere to go for support.
To go back to the subject of possibly increasing the existing system of penalties for petty crimes: be honest now, if the punishment for something like littering was upped to say, two days in jail, would you as a citizen go and sit those two days in jail or try to bribe the officer? I freely admit I'd bribe the officer. Why?
1) You won't come out of jail the same as you went in. That's right, "Bubba" isn't really a joke in our penal system,
2) The first time this happens it'd serve as a major wake-up call to me and I certainly wouldn't litter again.
That's all it would take really for petty criminals. One good scare and they'll be straight for a long time again. Whereas with career criminals, they're used to jail, used to getting arrested and used to coming back out and committing the same crime(s)...these are the people that need to be targetted.
In a perfect world we wouldn't want people to just do whatever they want against the law until they get caught, but we don't live in a perfect world. People will continue to do things they think they can get away with until they get caught. When they do get caught, condemning them for life (by locking them up where serious criminals can harm them and give them HIV/AIDS/other diseases) you'll just be creating another person which has nothing to lose. We have too many of them in our country already. That's why criminals are becoming more and more brazen.
It's not only that for the most part they get away with their crimes, it's also that they
have nothing to lose and
don't really know any better. Our present government made false promises to them of housing, food and electricity. The basics which only a few of us are priviledged enough to afford at the moment. Now if you just came out of an era where you were downtrodden and had to go to a filthy, unhygienic bathroom instead of a pristine, sweet-smelling one because of your skin colour and are now pretty much damned to the same fate even though "times have changed", you're not really going to be aware of much else that has supposedly changed.
I can pretty much see now how what I've said above can be twisted around into a racial issue so let me just say this first: like it or not, there are more poor black people than poor white people. The process of integrating them into our workforce has been going on for more than ten years now but still millions will be without work. Refer to my previous post where I suggest just one of the ways in which we could perhaps curb this unemployment figure.
"But hey, this isn't my problem. If they're poor, they should get off their lazy back-sides and work!" Work where? There aren't any jobs.
Back to our government: while they're spending millions on parties and bids to get the Soccer Worldcup/Olympics/whatever hosted in our country, thousands live on the streets and die at night from starvation, crime, drug abuse, et cetera. This is just yet another debate which forms part of all the other debates we've had and with this huge chain of debates none of you can fail to see how everything is interlinked.
That, to my mind, is the "bigger picture". Everything is a facet of everything else and addressing the one issue will just highlight another issue.
So while crime is a valid first issue to tackle, we really need to evaluate
all of the
other issues that have contributed to the level of crime and discuss ways in which we could address them for the better. So far I've touched on
- Corruption in the government and police force
- Poverty and unemployment (goes hand in hand with lack of training and skills)
- Inadequate prison system (and for that matter, inadequate judicial system)
- Poor minimum wage (also a facet of lack of training)
There are many other points, of that I am sure, but I see the above points as part of the rotten core that makes the apple of South Africa look nice and putrid to outsiders.