IPB
Looking for something specific? Search the Vault9 network:
Custom Search
Your Ad Here

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Welcome, guest. By registering you'll be able to experience the full Vault9 package. Join a community of almost 8 000 members (and over a quarter of a million posts) and enjoy many benefits.


 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Intel Demonstrates new 45nm Transistors and Conroe's Successor, hmmm
Fishfly
post Feb 7 2007, 05:05 PM
Post #1


Gave my left testicles to research in stem cell tech :(
Group Icon

Group: V9 Mod
Posts: 9,630
Joined: 5-August 03
From: Johannesburg
Member No.: 1,474
Sex: Male





QUOTE
They often say that the bigger a company gets, the more difficult it is to make sweeping changes to fix problems. Analogous to quickly turning a small boat vs. a large tanker, no one would have ever expected Intel to change so quickly over the past several months.

It's not only on the performance side that we've seen tremendous change; after all, it just took a new architecture to do that. No, the change we're speaking of here is in how Intel conducts itself, how freely it shares information today and how very different the road to 45nm has been compared to the move to 90nm or 65nm.

Today Intel is announcing a number of details on its 45nm process node, including official details on the first family of 45nm processors due out later this year. The announcements themselves, as you will soon see, are impressive enough, but arguably more interesting is the amount of detail Intel is giving away at this point. In the past we've had to go to sources other than official Intel channels for this sort of information, but that has all changed with the new Intel.

On track for first production by the end of 2007 with the Penryn family of processors (mobile, desktop and server), is Intel's 45nm manufacturing process. As with any move to smaller transistors, the 45nm node will make chips smaller and run faster. Intel is actually seeing good feature scaling with its 45nm process, quoting a ~2x improvement in transistor density. In other words, if you took a 100mm^2 65nm chip and built it on Intel's 45nm process, it would be roughly a 50mm^2 chip after the shrink. While logic and cache structures generally end up scaling very well with a process shrink, I/O structures (e.g. main memory interface circuits) don't which is why the improvement in transistor density is roughly and not exactly 2x.

Of course, in the past Intel has usually coupled new process technology with more features so you shouldn't expect to see 45nm Penryn chips as simply smaller Core 2 Duos. We will look at Penryn's die in a moment, but a larger cache, SSE4 and other unannounced microarchitectural enhancements can be expected.

The story of Intel's 45nm process doesn't end with details on its feature scaling however. Intel has made some fairly significant changes to the transistors themselves that make them more efficient than normal.


LINK

Well well it seems as the move to 65nm die shrink was not sufficient... now intel is talking about 45nm process, what I cannot understand is why they don't bother optimising any of their products they bring out... what good is creating a semi refined product? we all saw how AMD took intels old 800mhz fsb and transformed into a beast ousting the 1066fsb.


--------------------
Jou ma se Balhara, I'm classified as a coloured!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CrEaTi0n
post Feb 7 2007, 09:29 PM
Post #2



Group Icon

Group: Administration
Posts: 1,790
Joined: 4-January 03
From: ‮Sandton, Johannesburg
Member No.: 827
Sex: Male




yeh - they keep wanting to go smaller and not scaling what they have, quite weird.

Should still be interesting how small these chips are in 5 yrs time dry.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
W@RP@T}{
post Feb 8 2007, 07:10 AM
Post #3


Expert
Group Icon

Group: Elite
Posts: 1,587
Joined: 19-May 04
From: Beccleuch
Member No.: 2,951
Sex: Male




I'm waiting for Barcelona to hit the desktop market, apparently AMD says it will be 40% faster than Conroe, the proof is always in the pudding but AMD arn't know for talking crap


--------------------
Too Cool
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RenegadeNukes
post Feb 11 2007, 06:34 AM
Post #4


Guildmaster Of The Alliance Of Khaos
Group Icon

Group: Senior
Posts: 1,604
Joined: 9-January 07
From: Saar, Bahrain (NRI)
Member No.: 7,914
Sex: Male




Agreed!

Lets see how this thing goes
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
darsh39
post Nov 6 2007, 11:29 AM
Post #5


Member
Group Icon

Group: Junior
Posts: 3
Joined: 6-November 07
Member No.: 10,846
Sex: Male




i dont know y people say AMD is only for gamers....?
i use AMD and its a great experience!!!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th March 2010 - 06:41 AM